Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins - Campbell, CA
Posted by: Groundspeak Regular Member ucdvicky
N 37° 17.326 W 121° 55.984
10S E 594572 N 4127440
A civil case about free speech suppression turns into a case study in constitutional law.
Waymark Code: WM2HC7
Location: California, United States
Date Posted: 11/04/2007
Published By:Groundspeak Premium Member cache_test_dummies
Views: 88

The case center around a bunch of students who were getting signatures for a petition on the grounds of the shopping center. A security guard asked them to leave, saying that the activity violated the center's rules. The student followed order and later sued the shopping center in California state court for violating their First Amendment rights.

The U.S. Supreme Court in their ruling in 1980 found that the students had:

" 1. Under the California Constitution, individuals may peacefully exercise their right to free speech in parts of private shopping centers regularly held open to the public, subject to reasonable regulations adopted by the shopping centers

2 Under the U.S. Constitution, states can provide their citizens with broader rights in their constitutions than under the federal Constitution, so long as those rights do not infringe on any federal constitutional rights

This holding was possible because California's constitution contains an affirmative right of free speech which has been liberally construed by the Supreme Court of California, while the federal constitution's First Amendment contains only a negative command to Congress to not abridge the freedom of speech. The Supreme Court rejected the shopping center's argument that California's free speech right amounted to a "taking" of the shopping center under federal constitutional law.

The vote to uphold the California decision was unanimous, although three justices disagreed with part of the reasoning in Justice William Rehnquist's opinion for the majority. Justices Thurgood Marshall, Byron White, and Harry Blackmun filed separate concurring opinions.

Because of the Pruneyard case, people who visit shopping centers in California may regularly encounter people seeking money or attention for various causes, including charitable solicitations, qualifying petitions for amendments to the state constitution, voter registration drives, and sometimes a beggar. In turn, many shopping centers have posted signs to explain that they do not endorse the views of people exercising their right to free speech, and that if patrons do not give them money, the speakers will go away." Source: Wikipedia
Date of crime: 01/01/1979

Public access allowed: yes

Fee required: no

Web site: [Web Link]

Visit Instructions:
To post a visit log for waymarks in this category, you must have personally visited the waymark location. When logging your visit, please provide a note describing your visit experience, along with any additional information about the waymark or the surrounding area that you think others may find interesting.

We especially encourage you to include any pictures that you took during your visit to the waymark.
Search for...
Geocaching.com Google Map
Google Maps
MapQuest
Bing Maps
Nearest Waymarks
Nearest Infamous Crime Scenes
Nearest Geocaches
Create a scavenger hunt using this waymark as the center point
Recent Visits/Logs:
Date Logged Log User Rating  
FolsomNatural visited Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins - Campbell, CA 04/19/2015 FolsomNatural visited it
saopaulo1 visited Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins - Campbell, CA 08/14/2009 saopaulo1 visited it
ucdvicky visited Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins - Campbell, CA 01/04/2008 ucdvicky visited it

View all visits/logs