One of the newer memorials at the Vicksburg National Military Park, this bronze of African American Union Soldiers in combat is located on Grant Ave. near the Kansas State Memorial.
A plaque on the front of this memorial reads as follows:
"Commemorating the service of the 1st and 34th Mississippi, African Descent, and all Mississippians of African descent who participated in the Vicksburg Campaign."
From the National Park Service website:
African-American soldiers and sailors served in the armies and navies of both the Union and Confederacy during the Civil War. By the end of the conflict, over 178,000 black soldiers saw service with the Union army, while as many as 18,000 African-Americans joined the Union navy. Service figures for the Confederate States are unknown. African-American participation in the Civil War had far-reaching effects and implications for the black servicemen themselves, their white comrades in arms, and the society of which they were struggling to become a part and gain respect. The campaign, siege, and defense of Vicksburg provides two of the earliest instances of African-American soldiers serving in combat during the Civil War. At Port Hudson in May of 1863, and Milliken's Bend the following month, African-Americans proved their mettle on the field of battle, thus quieting some of their harshest critics and winning the confidence of others. The contributions of those men and others like them who served both North and South during the Vicksburg campaign is commemorated on the grounds of Vicksburg National Military Park by the erection of the Mississippi African-American Monument.
The African-American Monument is located on the south side of Grant Avenue between milepost 4.3 and 4.4. Erected by the State of Mississippi at a cost of $300,000, including $25,000 contributed by the City of Vicksburg, the sculpture is the work of Dr. Kim Sessums, from Brookhaven, Mississippi. The monument consists of three bronze figures on a base of black African granite — two black Union soldiers, and a common field hand. The field hand and one soldier support between them the second soldier, who is wounded and represents the sacrifice in blood made by black soldiers on the field of battle during the Civil War. The field hand looks behind at a past of slavery, while the first soldier gazes toward a future of freedom secured by force of arms on the field of battle.
A different perspective from the local African American Community in Mississippi is presented in The Jackson Advocate (but the article is locked so I cannot copy and paste it here): (
visit link)
From Jubilo! The Emancipation Century website: (
visit link)
"The African American Soldier Memorial in Vicksburg, MS; and an Old(?) ‘Grey Curtain’/NPS Controversy
Posted on March 23, 2011 by lunchcountersitin
There are many dozen, perhaps several hundred, Confederate memorials and monuments throughout the South and the country. A partial list of them is here on Wiki; that list is certainly not complete, failing to include, for example, the Stone Mountain Confederate Memorial Carving, or the Confederate Memorial at Courthouse Square in Oxford, Mississippi.
By contrast, there may not even be a dozen memorials or monuments to United States Colored Troopers in the South or in the nation. {UPDATE: A list of monuments to USCT is here.} I have found a couple of monuments to faithful slaves, such as this one and this one. I’ve also found that there are almost half a dozen memorials to Buffalo Soldiers throughout the country.
One of the small number of memorials to US Colored Troops is the African American Monument in Vicksburg, Mississippi. In 1999, former Vicksburg Mayor Robert M. Walker, who is black, proposed placement of a monument in Vicksburg National Military Park recognizing the contributions of African American soldiers during the Vicksburg campaign. With funding that included $25,000 from the city of Vicksburg, which is 60% black, groundbreaking for the monument was held on September 20, 2003, with dedication of the memorial on February 14, 2004.
(Mississippi provided 17,869 men to the United States Colored Troops. Only Louisiana (24,502), Kentucky (23,703), and Tennessee (20,133) had more men of African descent in the USCT. All told, just under 179,000 black men enlisted in the USCT, according to Wiki.)
A National Park Service (NPS) brochure for the monument notes that “of the more than 1,300 monuments in the park, this memorial is the first to honor black troops, and the first tribute of its type honoring African American soldiers placed on any of the Civil War battlefields administered by the National Park Service.” The brochure describes the monument:
The nine-foot tall sculpture depicts three figures – two Union soldiers representing the 1st and 3d Mississippi Infantry, African Descent, that participated in the Vicksburg campaign, and the third a civilian laborer. The soldier on the left looks toward the future that he helped secure through force of arms. The civilian looks to the past and the institution of slavery that he has left behind. Between them they support a wounded comrade, representing the sacrifice in blood made by African American soldiers on the field of battle.
The placement of the monument in Vicksburg National Military Park was not without controversy, and helps explain why African Americans have not shown the kind of interest in creating these types of monuments as one might think; the obstacles that get in the way can be very discouraging. These are excerpts from a 2004 article titled “Battle of Vicksburg being fought again over recognition of black Civil War troops” by Earnest?McBride in the Jackson Advocate newspaper, from around the time the monument was being completed and dedicated:
Ironically, The First Mississippi USCT unit headed by Sgt. Major Norman Fisher of Jackson, the only group of black Civil War re-enactors connected to the Vicksburg campaign, is left out of nearly all [monument dedication] events staged by the National Park Service or other local sponsors. “Nobody’s notified me about going there and saying anything,” Fisher said in exasperation Monday evening.
Having met with Park officials in mid-August about Saturday’s groundbreaking, Fisher said he felt that park superintendent Bill Nichols and park historian Terry Winschel deliberately misled him regarding park responsibility for recognizing the black contribution to the Civil War. “They told me that the State of Mississippi was responsible for placing any monuments in the battlefield,” Fisher said. “I don’t like the idea of a state telling the federal government what to do in our national parks. I also suggested that instead of placing the proposed monument along the obscure location on Grant’s Avenue they should put it near the 7000 gravesites of the black troops buried in the cemetery. They said it would not be possible to place any statuary there. They also turned down my idea to rename the boulevard for the USCT soldiers.”
Fisher complains about the outdated film still being shown to all visitors to the park. “That film was made during the time of segregation in Mississippi and it doesn’t represent black people at all. There’s no mention of any of our fighting men. They say they don’t have funds to make a new film.”
One of the most influential web sites devoted to the black Civil War experience is Bennie McRae’s Lest We Forget vast data bank. McRae’s set of documents is one of the best collections of black history to ever come along. The site manager is also disturbed by the chicanery surrounding the inclusion of black troops as a part of the National Park’s standard program. “As for the Vicksburg Campaign,” McRae says, “all the troops should be acknowledged for their important roles.” This includes those at Milliken’s Bend, Lake Providence, Mound Plantation and at Port Hudson. Black sailors who were involved in the blockade should also be brought into the picture. There’s more than sufficient documentation and official records confirming the role of the black fighting men at Vicksburg. The USCT cavalry that was organized at Vicksburg after the Siege was one of the most effective units to serve in the Civil War. It makes no sense to bar these brave troops from admission to the National Park dedicated to Union fighting men.
Fisher suggests that Park historian Winschel, though an employee of the Union — the Federal Government — is really a Confederate loyalist deep within his heart. “I went to see him perform a monologue in Vicksburg a couple of times,” Fisher says. “He was all decked out in a Confederate uniform and he really poured his soul out about how bad the South had been treated. He actually had tears coming from his eyes. Instead of this kind of performance to satisfy the local pro-Confederates, the Park service needs to acknowledge that the black troops of the USCT exist and to fairly represent their role in the Civil War at Vicksburg and in other battles. They should change the name of the street where the USCT troops are buried. Change the brochures to show where African Americans fought. And they should sell more items related to Civil War African Americans in their visitors’ gift shop.”
Danger may lurk in defiance of the Grey curtain that has been drawn over Vicksburg National Park activities, however. Former Park Superintendent Paul McCrary was hounded out of Vicksburg and into early retirement in 1985 when he put the interests of the nation’s parks above the pedestrian interests of local Old-South Confederate sympathizers.
McCrary had served only one year before announcing his retirement after a running battle with “supposed historian” Gordon Cotton, curator of the Old Court House Museum and the editors of the Vicksburg Evening Post, the century-old daily newspaper, whose loyalties vary with the dominant white interests of the day. McCrary fenced in the Park and was reluctant to allow an annual “Run Through History” foot race to take place there. “Men from more than 26 states shed their blood so that a Union could be preserved,” McCrary wrote the local newspaper only days before his retirement. “These men, on the whole, suffered infinitely more than the citizens of Vicksburg… Some citizens of Vicksburg, as well as a supposed professional historian, Mr. Gordon Cotton, who profess such undying ‘love’ for the park, are more concerned about the appearance of a rail fence than supporting my efforts to preserve these national treasures.” In a parting shot towards the editor, McCrary wrote, “If your ‘love’ and caring for the park mean what you and a few citizens in Vicksburg have expressed, then I can only pity you, for your values are such that you are willing to prostitute the park’s integrity for your own personal pleasure and personal gain.” And the Vicksburg National Military Park remains the captive of local forces as much today as it did in McCrary’s day.
That article was written seven years ago, and lot of things could have changed since that time. Hopefully, the current National Park Service staff are following a more inclusive and accurate approach to the interpretation of the monument and its presentation to visitors.
Thanks to the Jackson Advocate which allowed me to quote from their article."