Hinton Rail Crash - 1986 - Hinton, Alberta
Posted by: Groundspeak Premium Member wildwoodke
N 53° 30.843 W 117° 20.650
11U E 477178 N 5929511
Quick Description: The Hinton train collision occurred at 8:40 am on February 8, 1986. Twenty-three people died and 95 others sustained injuries in a collision between a Canadian National (CN) freight train and a VIA Rail Canada passenger train near Hinton, Alberta.
Location: Alberta, Canada
Date Posted: 3/3/2012 9:37:37 PM
Waymark Code: WMDWWH
Published By: Groundspeak Premium Member Sneakin Deacon
Views: 6

Long Description:

The Hinton train crash occurred near this location at 8:40 a.m. on February 8, 1986. At the time there was a single track in this location that resulted in two trains travelling in the opposite direction being on a collision course. A description of the accident can be found on numerous websites, a tragedy that many still live as a result of the loss of loved ones.

The town of Hinton has an excellent write up on the nature of the train crash as follows:

Tragedy in Hinton

See: http://www.hinton.ca/index.aspx?NID=148

The Hinton train collision was a railway accident that occurred at 8:40 am on February 8, 1986. Twenty-three people were killed and 95 others sustained injuries in a collision between a Canadian National (CN) Railway freight train and a VIA Rail Canada passenger train. It was the most lethal Canadian rail disaster since the Dugald accident of 1947. It was surmised that the accident was a result of the crew of the freight train becoming incapacitated, and the resulting investigations revealed serious flaws in CN's employee practices.

Vicinity of the Accident

The accident took place on a stretch of Canadian National Railway's transcontinental main line near the Town of Hinton, west of Edmonton. Nearby towns are Jasper to the west and Edson to the east. Passenger service on the line was provided by VIA Rail Canada. Slightly over half of the 100 mile (160 kilometer) stretch of track between Jasper and Edson was double-tracked, including 11.2 miles (18 kilometers) of trackage from Hargwen siding west to Dalehurst siding. Traffic on this line was controlled with Centralized Traffic Control (CTC).


Details of the Accident

The Canadian National (CN) Railway's westbound train No. 413 left Edson at 6:40 am, and took the siding at Medicine Lodge to allow two eastbound trains to pass. It departed Medicine Lodge at 8:02 am and reached Hargwen at 8:20 am, where a section of double track started. The remote dispatcher at Edmonton had set the switch so that the train was routed onto the north track. At the same time VIA Rail's No. 4 train - the combined Super Continental and Skeena - stopped at Hinton. It left on time, five minutes later, at 8:25 am.

At 8:29 am, the dispatcher set the switch at Dalehurst, where the section of double track ended, to allow the Super Continental to take the south track. This switch setting would have caused the freight train to see signals indicating a stop. A two-light signal 13,600 feet (4.15 kilometres) east of Dalehurst showed yellow over red (meaning prepare to stop at the next signal). As the train approached this signal, it was already going full throttle at 59 miles per hour (96 km/h), faster than the 50 mile per hour limit on this stretch of track. It did not slow down after passing the signal.

Further west, there was a three-light signal, 490 feet (150 meters) east of the switch at Dalehurst that showed three solid red lamps, indicating a stop. The freight still did not slow down, instead jumping the switch and entering the section of single track occupied by the Super Continental. Had the Super Continental been even a minute early, it would have been past the switch at this point, but it was not. Seconds after the freight jumped the switch, at 8:40:52 am, the two trains collided 1,270 feet (387 meters) west of the switch.

Composition of the VIA Rail Train

On the morning of February 8, 1986, VIA Rail's No. 4 train, the combined Super Continental and Skeena, was travelling from Jasper east to Edmonton on its transcontinental journey. It consisted of 14 units in the following order:

  1. FP7A Diesel locomotive number 6566
  2. F9B Diesel locomotive number 6633
  3. Baggage car
  4. Coach
  5. Dome car number 513
  6. Sleeping car
  7. Sleeping car
  8. FP9A Diesel locomotive number 6300 (inoperative)
  9. Steam generator car
  10. Baggage car
  11. Coach
  12. Lounge car
  13. Sleeping car
  14. Steam generator car

The unusual make up of the train was the result of two separate trains being joined together in Jasper.

The first seven units had originated in Vancouver, and the next six units had originated in Prince Rupert. The last unit, the steam generator car, was added in Jasper on its way to Edmonton for maintenance. In all, 115 people were on the train: 94 passengers, 14 stewards, and seven crew.

Composition of the Canadian National (CN) Railway Train

Canadian National (CN) Railway's westbound train No. 413 consisted of 118 unit in the following order:

  1. Three locomotives (EMD GP38-2W number 5586, and two EMD SD40 numbers 5062 and 5104)
  2. A high-speed spreader
  3. 35 cylindrical hoppers loaded with grain
  4. Seven bulkhead flat cars loaded with large pipes
  5. 45 hoppers loaded with sulphur
  6. 20 loaded tank cars
  7. Six more grain cars
  8. A caboose

The train was 6,124 feet (1,866 meters) long and weighed 12,804 tons.

In the front locomotive were engineer John Edward (Jack) Hudson, aged 48, and brakeman Mark Edwards, aged 25. In the caboose was conductor Wayne "Smitty" Smith, aged 33.c


Investigation Findings

Why the Canadian National (CN) Railway's freight train failed to stop was unclear. A wrong-side signal problem was eliminated, leaving human error as the only possible cause. However, since the head-end crew of the freight train did not survive, it was not clear why they had erred. However, enough of their remains were found that testing was able to rule out drugs or alcohol as the cause.

Criticizing the "Railroader Culture"

A commission of inquiry investigated the crash. Justice René P. Foisy, from the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, held 56 days of public hearings and received evidence from 150 parties. The inquiry report was published on January 22, 1987. Instead of condemning any one individual, it instead condemned what Foisy described as a "railroader culture" that prized loyalty and productivity at the expense of safety.

As an example of this disregard of safety, it was noted that the crew of that train had boarded the locomotive at Edson "on the fly." While the locomotive was moving slowly through the yard, the new crew would jump on and the previous crew would jump off. While this method of changing crews saved time and fuel, it was a flagrant violation of safety regulations requiring a stationary brake test after a crew change. Management claimed to be unaware of this practice, even though it was quite common.

Identified Safety Concerns

Another frequently ignored safety regulation mentioned in the report was the "deadman's pedal," which a locomotive engineer had to keep depressed. Were he to fall asleep or pass out, his foot would slip from the pedal, triggering an alarm and engaging the train's brakes automatically a few seconds later. However, many engineers found this tiresome and bypassed the pedal by placing a heavy weight on it. It was uncertain whether the pedal had been bypassed in this case because the lead locomotive of the train had been destroyed.

A more advanced safety device was available, the Reset Safety Control (RSC), required crew members to take an action such as pushing a button at regular intervals, or else automatic braking would occur, but neither lead locomotive was equipped with this safety feature. While the second locomotive in the freight train was equipped with RSC, it was not assigned as the lead locomotive because it lacked a comfort cab. Management and union practice was to place more comfortable locomotives at the front of trains, even at the expense of safety.

The report also noted that although the front-end and rear-end crews should have been in regular communication, that did not appear to be the case in this accident. As the freight train reached Hargwen, Hudson radioed back to Smith that the signals were green, a communication that was heard by a following freight. As it ran towards Dalehurst there was no evidence of further communication. As the conductor is in charge of the train, had Smith felt that the train was out of control or there were serious problems, he should have pulled the brake cord in the caboose to stop the train. However, Smith, who appeared to be nervous while testifying, said that he did not feel that the freight was ever out of control, misjudging its velocity. He also testified that he attempted to radio Hudson on two radios and several channels, but neither seemed to be working, despite the fact that immediately after the crash Smith was able to contact the dispatcher by radio. Even were Smith's testimony true, he apparently did not consider the problem sufficiently serious to stop the train, a second misjudgment.

The suspicion was that Smith had neglected his duties by sitting at the more comfortable desk seat instead of in the cupola of the caboose, where he should have been and where he would have a clear view of the track and the signals. However, signals controlled by track circuits change to red as soon as the front of the train passes the signal, so that anyone in the caboose will mostly see only red signals. Tall wagons would also degrade visibility, even from the cupola of a caboose. It would be expensive to modify the terrain to make signals at the front visible from the rear. Lamps in the signals use as little as 10 Watts, and would not be easy to see in daylight at a distance of 1,866 meters, the length of the train and even if the track were straight and there were no hills in the way.

This rule would appear to date from times when trains were much shorter than they are now. A more useful variation of this rule would be like at the 2008 Chatsworth train collision for the engineer to tell the conductor about the aspect of the signal by radio.


Collision Damage & Loss of Life

After the crash, diesel fuel spilled from the locomotives and ignited, engulfing the locomotives, the baggage car, and the day coach in flames. The two crew members in each of the locomotives were killed.

Eighteen of the 36 occupants of the day coach were killed. The contents of a grain car were propelled on top of the car, helping to smother the fire somewhat. Had the sulphur cars, for instance, been at the front of the train, the death toll might have been higher.

The observation dome car behind the day coach suffered serious damage and was also hit by a freight car. One of its occupants was killed. The others were able to escape either through a broken window in the dome or through the hole left by the freight car. The two sleepers following the dome car derailed and were thrown on their sides. There were no deaths in these cars, but there were several injuries. The three passenger cars at the rear of the train did not derail, but there were some injuries.

As the accident unfolded, the cars on the freight train piled up on each other, resulting in a large pile of rolling stock. The three freight locomotives and the first 76 cars of the train were either destroyed or damaged.

Wikipedia also ha information with respect to the crash. See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinton_train_collision

Image from the accident: http://www.edmontonsun.com/news/alberta/2011/02/07/17184331.html

Website address: [Web Link]

Visit Instructions:
Tell of your visit. An original photo is encouraged. If you have something to "add to the story" please tell of it in your log.
Search for...
Geocaching.com Google Map
Google Maps
Bing Maps
Trails.com Maps
Nearest Waymarks
Nearest Railway Disaster Sites
Nearest Geocaches
Nearest Benchmarks
Nearest Hotels
Create a scavenger hunt using this waymark as the center point
Recent Visits/Logs:
There are no logs for this waymark yet.